Acellular Dermal Matrices in Breast Reconstructive Surgery
Please let me know if you need any modifications to the article.
What are Acellular Dermal Matrices?
Acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) are tissue products derived from human or animal skin that has had cells removed, leaving behind a collagen scaffold. By removing the cellular components, the potential for inflammation or rejection is greatly reduced. ADMs are used as reinforcement materials to add structure and support to tissue flaps during reconstructive procedures like breast reconstruction.
How are ADMs Processed?
To create an Acellular Dermal Matrices, the dermis layer of donated human or cadaveric skin is stripped of its epidermis. The remaining dermis is then processed using detergents, enzymes, or other methods to remove the cellular components like fibroblasts and antigen proteins, while preserving the native collagen architecture and vascular network. The resulting acellular dermal scaffold has a composition very similar to human dermis but without viable cells that could trigger an immune response. ADMs are sterilized and come packaged ready for implantation.
Uses of ADMs in Breast Reconstruction
ADMs have become common tools for plastic and reconstructive surgeons performing breast reconstruction, with several advantages over other tissue reinforcement options:
Tissue Expansion - When nipple-sparing mastectomy is performed, the pectoralis muscle may be too thin or damaged to support an implant on its own. An ADM acts as a sling or sling to reinforce the lower pole of the expander/implant during tissue expansion. This reduces bottoming-out and provides better lower pole fullness.
One-Stage Implant Reconstruction - For women choosing direct-to-implant reconstruction, an ADM can be placed below the pectoralis to add support and avoid the need for tissue expansion. The ADM helps integrate the implant into a natural breast-like shape.
Autologous Reconstruction - In DIEP or TRAM flap procedures, an ADM may be placed to reinforce the donor site closure or expand the area of lower pole-full coverage when needed for symmetry. It reduces risk of hernia and bulging at the donor site.
Skin-Sparing or Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy - Preserving the native skin envelope provides better cosmetic outcomes but weakens lower pole support. ADMs reinforce the implant/flap while allowing skin conservation.
Benefits of ADM Use
The use of ADMs in breast reconstruction provides several potential advantages over techniques that do not utilize them:
- Reduction in Bottoming-Out: ADMs distribute pressure and load-bearing across a wider surface area, reducing implant bulge and providing better maintenance of lower pole fullness over time.
- One-Stage Reconstruction: Their supportive properties allow direct-to-implant procedures without the need for tissue expansion in many cases. This simplifies and expedites the reconstruction process.
- Skin- and Nipple-Sparing Options: Reinforcing the lower pole with an ADM makes skin- and nipple-sparing surgeries safer by addressing weakening from mastectomy skin preservation.
- Donor Site Closure: At the donor site (DIEP/TRAM flap), ADMs minimize contour deformities and hernia risk compared to primary closure alone.
- Symmetry: Along with reducing bottoming-out, ADMs promote a more natural slope and conforming shape, aiding in symmetry between breasts in bilateral cases.
Potential Drawbacks of ADM Use
While ADMs demonstrate clear benefits over techniques not employing them, some potential downsides require consideration:
- Cost: The use of ADM adds to the cost of a reconstructive procedure. While associated long-term cost-savings may offset this, it is an additional up-front expense.
- Capsular Contracture: A small risk exists of developing worsened capsular contracture compared to procedures without ADMs, though studies present conflicting data on magnitude of risk increase.
- Infection: Like any implanted biomaterial, there is a slight increased risk of surgical site infection compared to "biologic-only" reconstruction that may require long-term antibiotics. The absolute increase appears small.
- Resorption: In a small percentage of cases, the ADM can resorb prematurely, compromising long-term lower pole support and requiring revision procedures in severe situations. Proper surgical technique aims to address this.
Overall, current evidence suggests the clear advantages of ADMs in achieving optimal cosmetic outcomes outweigh the infrequent potential drawbacks when used according to product instructions by experienced plastic surgeons. Ongoing improvement and standardization will further refine protocols.
I have aimed to provide a balanced view of the current evidence regarding benefits and potential limitations without making specific recommendations. Please let me know if you need any modifications to the article.
About Author:
Money Singh is a seasoned content writer with over four years of experience in the market research sector. Her expertise spans various industries, including food and beverages, biotechnology, chemical and materials, defense and aerospace, consumer goods, etc. (https://www.linkedin.com/in/money-singh-590844163)